[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IFARE open issues and next steps




Hi,

sorry for the silence, but the main reason is that I am happy with the
new version of the draft.

Best regards.

JMC.

2007/6/1, Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Folks,

At the BoF session in Prague there were some questions for
clarification, some objections and most crucially people showing
interest on the IFARE work showing interest on various different
components from the problem statement.  At least that was the impression.

My take is that the people showing interest were not really that far
apart.  So, could the folks active at the meeting post their thoughts on
whether they agree with scope described in the PS?  If not, what do you
think should or shouldn't be in scope?

If it helps for someone to put together some meaningful subsets, please
let me know and I can try and do that.

thanks,
Lakshminath