[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



<claudio.lordello@innovation.siemens.ca> using -f
smap (V2.1)
	id xma008402; Tue, 4 Apr 00 13:07:14 -0400
mailman.innovation.siemens.ca via smap (V2.1)
	id xma000769; Tue, 4 Apr 00 13:07:30 -0400
Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <2B8YR6XB>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:07:29 -0400
Message-ID: 
<EF806036BF5CD211B26400105A183A01015F9B28@ticsmtp1.innovation.siemens. 
ca>
From: Claudio Lordello <claudio.lordello@tic.siemens.ca>
To: ".IPSec-IETF" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: FQDN as phase 2 identity
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:07:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk


Hi,

I have a question about the use of FQDN or User FQDN identity types for a
phase 2 SA negotiation: What are the imposed requirements (i.e. MUST's on
the RFC's) on how to translate such FQDNs into its respective phase 2
selectors, if any? I would also appreciate to hear how other vendors are
doing it. DNS lookups?

Thanks for the help.

Claudio Lordello.
Siemens.