My understanding is that the isakmp-gss draft is an informational draft,
that basically documents one vendor's implementation (Microsoft).
As it turns out, we are also implementing the draft (we = Cisco),
and so wondered if this should be considered as a future RFC rather
than an informational draft. Is there anyone else out there
who plans to implement this?
The fact that more than one company is implementing from the draft is not
the deciding factor for whether it should go on standards track. If the
spec is not open to change (such as if it is a description of how the
originating company implemented the protocol), it should be an
Informational RFC. If the spec is open for change and better design, it
might be appropriate on standards track.