[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TOS copying considered harmful

To: Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TOS copying considered harmful
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:01:54 -0400
Cc: IP Security List <ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>U
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <><>
Sender: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Joe,

Oh yeah, serious heresy!

At the IP layer, IPsec is the only IETF standard, so until there is another standard, or even another WG chartered to develop such a standard, I can't see why it makes sense to put this info into 2003bis vs. 2401bis.

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Henry Spencer
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Stephen Kent
- Re: TOS copying considered harmful
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: TOS copying considered harmful
Next by Date: RE: TOS copying considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: TOS copying considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: TOS copying considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread