If one of the transforms, say IPComp, may elect not to include the d-h group attribute, how does your suggestion differ from the discussed statement of rfc2393bis?
rfc2393bis guidelines are one specific instance of my suggestion, but it covers more than that. I think the qm d-h attribute handling is a design flaw and the suggestion is a liberal way of dealing with it in a practical implementation. It's too bad there is no attribute list that applies to the SA payload as a whole... Sami -- Sami Vaarala / Pygmy Projects - We make it small! www.iki.fi/~silvere / silvere@iki.fi / No matter where you go, there you are. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.