[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2

To: IP Security List <ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
From: Henry Spencer <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:36:43 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <>
Sender: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Avram Shacham wrote:
> With your observation that packet size is not the problem, what is the
> extra complexity to *announce* a 16-bit CPI and the (optional)
> algorithm-related parameters...

However simple it may be to allocate, free, manage, and announce CPIs,
it is simpler not to do so.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
  - From: Avram Shacham

Prev by Date: Re: speaking of keys
Next by Date: Re: speaking of keys
Previous by thread: Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
Next by thread: Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread