[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: peer address protection and NAT Traversal

To: "'Francis Dupont'" <Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
From: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:34:53 -0800
Cc: <ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
Sender: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 
> => we have to specify in details the peer address management, and not
only
> for NAT traversal but also for mobility and multi-homing.
> 

This is of interest to us as we are currently implementing multi-homing
and active load balancing in our VPNs. What work has been done on it so
far? Any IDs or RFCs?

Regards,
Jayant
www.trlokom.com 

> Thanks
> 
> Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
  - From: Francis Dupont

References:
- Re: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
  - From: Francis Dupont

Prev by Date: RE: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
Next by Date: RE: AES cipher suites
Previous by thread: Re: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
Next by thread: Re: peer address protection and NAT Traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread