The requirement to run dynamic routing protocols was NOT the question asked. Please re-read Shelton's question before commenting on my answer. Quoting my answer out of context and applying alternate requirements is both rude and unhelpful.
In particular, he asked:
imagine that I have a GRE tunnel to a remote clinic; further suppose I need the traffic to be IPSec b/c of HIPPA regs. Should I have more accurately asked for IPSec in GRE, as opposed to GRE w/in IPSec?
I see nothing in here about dynamic routing protocols. Do you?
Sorry. I missed that it was Raymond and not Sandeep (the sender of the original email) who sent the email you replied to. I agree that Raymond's requirements are probably different from Sandeep's.
PS: I see no earlier reply in this thread. What is the subject and messageID of your earlier reply?
Message-ID: <3E5B1BA1.6050406@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:30:41 -0800 From: Lars Eggert <larse@xxxxxxx> To: ssakhuja@xxxxxxxxx CC: ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xbone <xbone@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
Lars -- Lars Eggert <larse@xxxxxxx> USC Information Sciences Institute
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature