[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
In your previous mail you wrote:
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> How important is it for everyone to support NAT-T?
> => I don't believe a MUST support is a good idea because this makes no
> sense for an IPv6 implementation.
Can we agree on "MUST support NAT-T if you support IPv4"?
=> I am not in favor of a MUST which has nothing to do with
interoperability, IMHO we should let the market do its job...
And I don't believe implementors who still have NAT-T support
in their plans like to become not compliant.