RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data

[Robert Glenn <glenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I just ran the exact same tests you described below against the NIST
reference implementation of SHA-1.  The results match the BSAFE SHA
and BSAFE HMAC-SHA results.

NIST SHA-1 Alg. Results:

HMAC-SHA 67 5b 0b 3a 1b 4d df 4e 12 48 72 da 6c 2f 63 2b fe d9 57 e9

SHA      4b 3a ed 5f 9f e4 01 59 b4 99 53 6f b8 a1 0c df 3b c6 2b 4c

Rob G.

In article <>, Edward Russell <erussell@ftp.com> writes:
>
>At 04:27 PM 2/3/97 +0100, Niels Ferguson wrote:
>>I have implemented HMAC using SHA-1 as hash function. I have found test
>>vectors for HMAC based on MD5, but not for SHA-1. Does anybody have test
>>vectors? If not, I would be happy to help create them.
>>
>
>At the interoperability event in Dallas, it appears that 
>the BSAFE SHA is incompatible with the CYLINK SHA. 
>
>In addition it appears that
>BSAFE Diffie-Hellman is incompatible with the CYLINK Diffie-Hellman
>
>We compiled our (FTP Software) implementation of ISAKMP  with either
>BSAFE or CYLINK libraries and tested against different vendors and
>got compatiblity or incompatibility based on which library we compiled
>with.
>
>That being said, I wrote a test program for both SHA and HMAC SHA
>and compiled it with CYLINK and then with BSAFE.  The results are 
>posted below. 
>
>HMAC KEY =
>0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x0b
>
>HMAC KEY LENGTH = 16
>DATA "Hi There"
>DATA LENGTH = 8
>
>DIGESTs:
>
>BSAFE HMAC SHA:
>67 5B 0B 3A 1B 4D DF 4E 12 48 72 DA 6C 2F 63 2B FE D9 57 E9 
>
>CYLINK HMAC SHA:
>BC F6 85 57 4C B8 AA B1 B6 42 CE CB F3 89 A0 79 F6 48 84 F3 
>
>
>BSAFE SHA:
>4B 3A ED 5F 9F E4 01 59 B4 99 53 6F B8 A1 0C DF 3B C6 2B 4C 
>
>CYLINK SHA:
>4C 2B C6 3B DF 0C A1 B8 6F 53 99 B4 59 01 E4 9F 5F ED 3A 4B 
>
>
>Edward Russell
>FTP Software
>erussell@ftp.com
>