[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
- To: Edward Russell <erussell@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
- From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:08:58 -0500
- Cc: "'ipsec@xxxxxxx'" <ipsec@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: erussell's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 1997 15:03:26 -0500". <>
- Organization: Secure Computing Canada Ltd.
- Phone: +1 416 813 2054
- References: <>
- Sender: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxx
In message <>, Edward Russell writes:
>
> O.K., O.K., C. Harald Koch gets the "Mirror Image" award for spotting what
> should have been obvious to us. But understand, we're running on only a
> handful of hours of sleep trying to get us all to interoperate. :-) I don't think
> I would characterize this as an "endian" problem though as that as more
> to do with byte arrangement within shorts and longs - I doubt the problem
> is caused by one platform compiled with the wrong byte order defined.
Thanks for the award :-)
I agree that it's not strictly an endian problem. I first discovered it when
comparing the results for some public-domain MD5 code between a SPARC
machine (big-endian) and an Intel machine (little-endian), and so the
problem has been tagged "endian" in my brain ever since.
> We'll try to establish if the same is true at the end of a Diffie Hellman exchange,
> but that will be a little trickier.
I'm crossing my fingers...
--
C. Harald Koch | Senior System Developer, Secure Computing Canada Ltd.
chk@border.com | 100 University Ave., 7th Floor, Toronto ON M5J 1V6
+1 416 813 2054 (voice) | "Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change."
+1 416 813 2001 (fax) | -Karen Murphy <karenm@descartes.com>