[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)

To: crawdad@xxxxxxxx (Matt Crawford)
Subject: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
From: suresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pyda Srisuresh)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ipsec@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <> from "Matt Crawford" at Sep 16, 98 08:43:41 am
Sender: owner-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxx

> 
> > 	Is it ok for the source port for IKE to be something other than
> > 	port 500?
> > 
> > Hopefully it is ok, as this eases ipsec across NAT boxes
> 
> Whoa!  Cognitive dissonance!
> 
To be clear, the NAT box Gabriel is refering to is a Host NAT server.
Host NAT server does not perform any address or port translation. 
Hope this helps.

cheers,
suresh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
  - From: bmanning

References:
- Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
  - From: Matt Crawford

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Previous by thread: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Next by thread: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread