[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICMP{,v6} type/code as a selector...

Stephen Kent wrote:
> I have no objection to adding selector support for ICMP, but let's not
> overload the port fields; we need to articulate a clear specification of
> what we convey under what circumstances as we broaden support beyond TCP &
> UDP.

This is what I meant to suggest when I said "generalize the port
fields...". Sorry if it wasn't clear - I'm all for this approach.