[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2



Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
>      To address the above requirements, three approaches have been
>      defined. Implementations MUST support method #1 below, and SHOULD
>      support method #2 or method #3 (or both).

I can also live with that proposal....

> Editorial suggestion: breaking out the three proposals as subsections 
> (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) would make it easier to read, particularly if you add 
> more text to them.

Definately. 
-- 
kivinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec