[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
> To address the above requirements, three approaches have been
> defined. Implementations MUST support method #1 below, and SHOULD
> support method #2 or method #3 (or both).
I can also live with that proposal....
> Editorial suggestion: breaking out the three proposals as subsections
> (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) would make it easier to read, particularly if you add
> more text to them.
Ipsec mailing list