Re: l2tp as ipsra solution

[Ricky Charlet <rcharlet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sara Bitan wrote:
> 
> > I do not think that our group should say "yeah, PPP based users
> > filters and machine level IKE to build IPsec privacy SAs are good enough
> > for every body" and stop there.
> 
> It is not what this WG is saying....
> 
> >
> >
> >         I think that some group in IETF will have to take on the task of
> > associating end users with new key material to feed privacy services. I
> > would like that group to be ipsra. And I hope that our group will at
> > least remain open to discussing it.
> 
> I think IPSRA already has the mandate to perform this task!
> 
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Ricky Charlet   : Redcreek Communications   : usa (510) 795-6903
> 
>  Sara.




Howdy Sara,

	Well, I'm glad to discover that I misread and over reacted. And I'm
glad this discussion is going forward.

-- 
  Ricky Charlet   : Redcreek Communications   : usa (510) 795-6903