Re: l2tp as ipsra solution

["W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sara Bitan wrote:
> 
> "W. Mark Townsley" wrote:
> >
> > Sara Bitan wrote:
> > >
> > > Our charter requires to "provide user authentication to *IKE*".
> > > User authentication in the l2tp based solution is supplied by ppp, and is never
> > > transferred to IKE. This solution does not provide a solution to our
> > > requirements.
> >
> > I thought we were still *defining* the requirements.
> This is not a requirement, this is a quote from the WG's *charter*.
> This is one of the purposes of forming this WG.

We are to provide user auth to IKE, but are not allowed to alter IKE.
Strictly interpreted, this is a pretty narrow field to play in. By
definition, the user auth method will be disparate to IKE in some sense,
it is just a matter of how much. 

> 
>  Sara.
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Name: sarab.vcf
>    sarab.vcf       Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
>                Encoding: 7bit
>             Description: Card for Sara Bitan