[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4]
>>>>> "Shoichi" == Shoichi Sakane <sakane@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Section 4.3:
>> [**] I need explicit review from the IPsec reviewer of this
>> section to make sure it is compatible with 2401bis. IN
>> addition, any differences between how this works and how IKE
>> would set up the same SA need to be called out. It is fine for
>> there to be differences, but I want to make sure the working
>> group explicitly decided the differences are a good thing.
Shoichi> i dont think there are differneces between them. because
Shoichi> KINK just carries IKEv1 quick mode. KINK can establish
Shoichi> the same SA that IKEv1 do so.
Section 4.3 calls out a lot of explicit detail. For example it says
exactly when to add SAs to the SPD, etc. This detail is presented as
I am asking for review to confirm that this detail did not conflict
with anything in the IKE spec. If section 4.3 said to just do what
IKE does, I would not have called it out.
I think section 4.3 is well written and it is good to have. I just
want to make sure there is not an inconsistency.