[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: KINK issue list rev.2

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:32, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <mat@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>     Michael> So I'm rather ambivalent. The current phrasing will
>     Michael> certainly do it's main job: stopping a receiver from
>     Michael> incorrectly parsing future versions and the potential
>     Michael> exploits that could result.  Maybe we really should leave
>     Michael> it at that if for no other reason from a security/system
>     Michael> analysis standpoint.
> If you want to leave it please at least say that the receiver must
> send back the appropriate bad version error.

Well, I'm actually asking what others want here. I sort
of tend toward this, but it's not just my call here...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part