Re: pre-kink-10

[Shoichi Sakane <sakane@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think that this sentence should not be in the introduction,
should be in the security consideration that Ken mentioned.
On the other hand, there is a same sentence in the security
consideration.  So we might be able to just remove it.

However the sentence was added after a IESG review.  Thus I do not
know we can remove it easily.

Derek, could you decide whether it can remove or not ?

> > Relatively minor stuff:
> > 
> > - Introduction:
> > 
> >        Kerberos, like any internet protocol, does have
> >      its own security considerations.  You can find them discussed in
> >      [KERBEROS].
> > 
> >    That's security-considerations material, not introductory  
> > material.  In fact, I think the security considerations section  
> > already talks about it.
> 
> These sentences seem to have been added as a result of the
> previous IESG review, for a comment from Randy Bush.
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=9126>
> (See the first comment.)
> I feel he was not focusing on security vulnerabilities (as he gave
> scalability as an example).
> So, I'll replace that part with the following.
> 
>    Kerberos, like any internet protocol, does have drawbacks on certain
>    environments.  You can find them discussed in [KERBEROS] and its
>    references.
> 
> Do you have better sentences?