Issue with the requirements document: PKIX-centric terminology

[Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>]

Greetings again. draft-wallace-ta-mgmt-problem-statement-01.txt does 
a good job of listing the problems we need to deal with, but some 
parts use PKIX language in places they don't need to. It's fine if 
these places are marked off with "for example, in PKIX ...", but in 
many places that is not included.

To help make it clearer that the requirements are for management of 
all public keys, I propose that the following topics be removed or 
delimited as PKIXy examples:

- Name constraints

- Key usage

- Expiration dates of keys

- Possibly others that I have missed

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium