Re: List of vendors shipping XAuth

["Stephane Beaulieu" <stephane@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Will,

Great idea.

XAUTH has been around for about 2-3 years now.  I haven't seen any major
issues with it in the last year (other than backwards compatibility issues
with the older versions).  The idea of this mailing list was to have a forum
to discuss technical roadblocks.  So far, I haven't seen any.

If we can gather this kind of data, it will help move the draft to RFC
Informational, and then we can all move on (and interoperate, of course ).

Stephane.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Will Price" <wprice@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ietf-xauth@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: List of vendors shipping XAuth


> Sorry, sent that half baked. One more question:
>
> Supports hybrid auth extensions?
>
> I imagine people would appreciate if all responses were sent directly to
> me with the title "XAUTH DATA" and I will collate and repost to this list.
>
>
> Will Price wrote:
> >
> > One of the stumbling blocks in trying to ship XAuth support has been the
> > lack of information regarding shipping XAuth products. Is there any
> > existing compilation of such information? We'd like to test our
> > implementation against at least 3 three shipping or near shipping
> > implementations within the next 3 weeks (ie we're shipping it real
soon.)
> >
> > If there is not, I would volunteer to collect the information. I'd like
to
> > keep it simple like:
> >
> > Product Name
> > Version
> > Company
> > XAuth Version
> > Send xauth vendor ID (5 or 6?)
> > Understand xauth vendor ID?
> > Minimum XAuth version supported
> > Maximum XAuth version supported
> > Gateway or client
> > Date shipping since or date expected to ship
> >
> > --
> >
> > Will Price, Director of Engineering
> > PGP Security, Inc.
> > a division of Network Associates, Inc.
>
> --
>
> Will Price, Director of Engineering
> PGP Security, Inc.
> a division of Network Associates, Inc.