[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

comments on ICPM IPProtocolEndpoint

To: ".MailList - ipsec-policy" <ipsec-policy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: comments on ICPM IPProtocolEndpoint
From: Ricky Charlet <rcharlet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:11:48 -0700
List-archive: <http://www.vpnc.org/ipsec-policy/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ipsec-policy.vpnc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ipsec-policy-request@vpnc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Redcreek Communications
Sender: owner-ipsec-policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Howdy,
	
	I have a question about IPProtocolEndpoints. From reading the DMTF
white paper on IPsec Policy Model, it implies that IPProtocolEndpoints
serve two roles. They are the interfaes which are IKE enabled, and they
are the entities which will ultimatly be protected. I hope I'm just
reading the model wrong. Because Secruity Gateways need to (of course)
represent endpoints for protection which likely will not be the same as
the Secruity Gatway's IKE enabled interface.


-- 
  Ricky Charlet   : Redcreek Communications   : usa (510) 795-6903

Follow-Ups:
- Re: comments on ICPM IPProtocolEndpoint
  - From: Lee Rafalow

Prev by Date: Improve your stepfamily life
Next by Date: multi technology packet classification
Previous by thread: Improve your stepfamily life
Next by thread: Re: comments on ICPM IPProtocolEndpoint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread