Re: meeting in Vienna

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <1865.1058438546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Richardso
n writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>So, is Friday morning cancelled then?
>
>I am pretty upset that:
>  a) no meeting get scheduled.

There was supposed to be one.  Due to errors all around, it didn't 
happen.  Exactly what happened isn't clear.

>  b) a proposal to have it Friday was accepted and then changed.

Many people leave by then; the question (and I don't know the answer -- 
Luis?) was who among the key people was would still be here.

>  c) that only two hours notice was given.
>
Agreed.  Both the situation and the error recovery mechanism were bad.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)